2centsworth.info

I think it is high time for our friends at the highest reaches of government to “share in the sacrifice.”

George, Dick, Don, and Condaleeza got us into this mess.

Thousands of soldiers and marines are on their third or fourth tour of duty in Iraq, more than three thousand have made the ultimate sacrifice, around twenty thousand have been maimed, and the US taxpayer is pouring billions of dollars down a rathole.

I am getting a little tired of listening to this smug, complacent bunch of fools driving around in armored limousines surrounded by Secret Service agents talking about how they “feel the pain” of our injured troops, widows and orphans, and the public in general.

Let’s see some real sacrifice… Collectively the Gang of Four is worth tens, if not hundreds, of millions of dollars. I think its time to pony up. I’d like to see the Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Rice fortunes donated to US Treasury. Let ‘em keep a million dollars a piece to supplement their lavish government and corporate pensions but let’s use the rest to pay for this debacle they’ve jointly created. Even with all their millions it will just be a drop in the bucket… But, hey, it’s the thought that counts.

I got this from page A13 of today’s New York Times (January 12, 2007).

In February 2003, prior to the US invasion of Iraq, General Shinseki (the then US Army Chief of Staff) said the following in testimony before Congress:

“Something on the order of several hundred thousand soldiers are probably, you know, a figure that would be required to stabilize Iraq after an invasion.

We are talking about post-hostilities control over a piece of geography that’s fairly significant, with the kinds of ethnic tensions that could lead to other problems…

And so it takes a significant ground force presence to maintain a safe and secure environment, to ensure that people are fed, that water is distributed, all the normal responsibilities that go along with a situation like this.”

After these remarks before Congress, the Bush administration led by Donald Rumsfeld first vilified and then marginalized General Shinseki who then faded away into retirement.

Three years and three thousand combat deaths later, General Abizaid, the departing commander of US forces in the Middle East told Congress:

“General Shinseki was right that a greater international force contribution, U.S. force contribution and Iraqi force contribution should have been immediately available after major combat operations.”

General Shinseki has not made any public statements since retirement and certainly isn’t telling anyone “I told you so…” He doesn’t need to.

Years later, with Iraq’s infrastructure still in a shambles, and outright civil war going on between Shia and Sunni, the Bush administration wants to send another 20,000 troops and commit additional $ billions to Iraq reconstruction… Way Too little, way too late.

I read an interesting column in the February 2007 issue of Dr. Dobb’s (a software development journal). The column is by Ed Nisley and he is discussing a report on the problems with electronic voting machines in Cuyahoga County, Ohio during the recent Federal election. The column is entitled Root the Vote: Wetware… It doesn’t seem to be on the Dr. Dobbs website (www.ddj.com) yet but it may show up next month.

I don’t think I have ever talked to someone who is professionally involved with computers or software who isn’t anything but appalled by the idea of purely electronic voting.

As Ed Nisley comments in the column, the current issue is how difficult it is to implement a new voting technology with a temporary once-a-year or once-every-couple-of-years organization largely staffed by volunteers. This years problems were due to poorly designed machines, poor organization, and a lack of training. The issue in the future will be deliberate, subtle, difficult-or-impossible to detect, vote tampering.

In my electoral district we use the “fill in the oval” paper ballots which are then scanned electronically. In my opinion, that is the way to go. Most people are able to figure out how to fill in the ovals, there is a permanent ballot that can be recounted. The thousands of paper ballots would be difficult to alter without its being noticed.

Given the tendency towards dirty tricks in US politics and the generally corrupt relationship between government officials and government contractors, I think purely electronic voting is a recipe for disaster for our democracy…. Just imagine the closed room conversations… “Not only can we guarantee a smoothly run election… For only a few million more we can make sure your guys win!”

If we end up with a significant fraction of the votes being counted in a purely electronic manner then we will also get deliberate biasing in the outcomes. And it will be, essentially, undetectable. You can at least argue about a “hanging chad.”

In fact, the first we will know that there is anything wrong is when some techie gets sufficiently disgusted (or decides he wasn’t paid enough) and we wake up to find we’ve just elected Mickey Mouse president.

Ed Nisley called attention to a recent New York Times article (U.S. Investigates Voting Machines’ Venezuela Ties – October 29, 2006) about the Venezuelan government buying a US company that makes electronic voting machines… That were purchased for use in Venezuela’s elections. Apparently this is being investigated by the Bush administration… One is being asked to believe that a Republican administration is suddenly interested in free and fair elections in South America?

If you want to find out more, check the following links:

Cuyahoga Election Review Panel – Final Report

Election Science Institute – DRE Analysis for May 2006 Primary

Avi Rubin’s blog

VerifiedVoting.org